Balanced earnings distribution: Increasing Value Accrual for STG Stakers

Issue Statement

With the rollout of Stargate v2, the AIPM and Hydra’s demonstration of superior capital efficiency, the need to aggressively accumulate Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) at current levels has diminished. The Stargate DAO proposes adjusting the distribution of protocol earnings, increasing the share allocated to veSTG stakeholders to 50% of total earnings while retaining an equal 50% as POL.

The existing Vote-Escrowed Stargate Token (veSTG) mechanism cannot be upgraded. By increasing the distribution of protocol earnings, we aim to incentivize token holders to stake STG and participate in ecosystem governance. This shift aligns incentives with a dual mandate: fostering the protocol’s long-term growth while delivering reasonable returns to Stargate DAO stakeholders.

Allocating 50% of transfer fees and investment income to veSTG holders enhances the value proposition of the STG token for all holders. Simultaneously, retaining 50% as POL ensures sustainable operations and supports the Stargate Foundation, which relies on treasury STG sales to fund ongoing activities.

Proposed Solution

The updated fee structure for Stargate is as follows:

  • veSTG Holders: 50% of the previous calendar month’s transfer fees and investment income, distributed by the 10th of the current month.
  • POL: 50% of earnings retained as Protocol-Owned Liquidity.

Measuring Success

In June 2022 (see “Value Accrual for STG Stakers”), the initial target was 15 million STG tokens staked, with an average lockup duration of 2 years. Following SIP#18 (Staking Reward Distribution Plan), the actual amount staked has doubled to 36 million STG. However, the average staking duration has fallen to approximately 300 days—well below the 2-year goal.

Despite achieving significant growth over the last three years, the STG token price has underperformed (after accounting for market conditions and sales of tokens from treasury used to fund Stargate operations).
Four primary factors explain this:

  1. Investor Expectations: Stakers require higher returns to compensate for long-term risks, including duration risk, smart contract vulnerabilities, opportunity costs, rising competition, and technological obsolescence.
  2. Farming Rewards: Liquidity providers to pools were until recently paid in STG placing a constant sell pressure on the token. Although incentives for liquidity providers have been turned off, STG is paid as incentives for other sources of liquidity such as Boyco pools.
  3. Governance Misalignment: Large STG holders, including team members with vested allocations, have been excluded from governance participation and from earning a staking yield.
  4. Margin Compression and Competition: not all competitors are acting in ways that are sustainable. Many are pushing models that are not financially viable, can’t scale or settle high value transactions economically.

This proposal addresses these issues by rebalancing incentives to better align stakeholder interests with the protocol’s financial performance. It aims to encourage staking STG to provide an attractive income stream as a reasonable market return for long-term investing in the Stargate ecosystem.

A separate proposal will follow, seeking DAO approval for employee staking and governance participation after the team allocation vesting period concluded in March 2025.

Execution, Timeline, and Costs

If approved, implementation will begin on June 1, 2025, with the first distribution under the new 50/50 structure occurring on July 10, 2025, reflecting June’s earnings. Financial accounting and implementation costs will be covered by the existing Stargate DAO budget.

Summary

Market signals indicate a need to evolve the utility and functionality of the STG token. This proposal balances earnings distribution to encourage staking and reinforces long-term commitment to the protocol. While POL growth remains important, the interests of veSTG stakeholders are equally critical to Stargate’s financial success. By aligning these priorities, the DAO can strengthen the ecosystem and enhance value accrual for all.

2 Likes

Thank you to team members and other stakeholders who have posted useful clarifications to the revised proposal added to Fee Distribution Revamp so far.

Looking forward to getting a balance between protocol growth and financial returns for DAO participants.

In line with the StargateDAO Governance Process, I invite further feedback and comments for the next 7 days before final revisions and posting on Snapshot.

Key metrics at time of proposal

Stargate

Stargate price: $0.17
STG locked: 36,689,000
veSTG: 10,315,000
Global average lock time: 307 days
Stargate treasury value $115,000,000
Stargate March 2025 fees: $236,000

Cryptocurrency market

Total stablecoin supply: $230.2B
Stablecoin addresses: 31.4M
Stablecoin transaction volume (30D): $2264B
Stablecoin transactions (30D): 626.5M

1 Like

Completely agree & will be supporting the updated fee structure.

It’s challenging to pinpoint a single reason for the underperformance of the STG token in the open market, as multiple factors are at play. While we can explore this further in a separate proposal, it’s unclear whether enabling employee staking and governance alone would significantly improve price action.

That said, there may be some low-hanging fruit worth considering, especially if the Foundation is open to it. For instance, since the Foundation’s budget is currently 100% in STG, we could explore swapping a portion of it for stablecoins from the treasury. This would help cover operational expenses without putting immediate sell pressure on STG, which is currently necessary to pay bills.

1 Like

I’ve made some small revisions to better explore the reasons for token underperformance and the opportunities for further growth once addressed.

I also appreciate that you are supporting a more moderate increase to income distribution. I don’t think it is wise to be seeking unbalanced distributions even if POL appears sufficient for current transaction volumes.

2 Likes

I think it’s important to clearly define what qualifies as investment income in this context. For instance, whether the Swell incentives are included.

Perhaps @stgNutzs can provide some input on this.

1 Like

Investment income is any time the DAO realises a capital gain I.e. there is a sale of an non-STG asset from protocol owned liquidity for another token for a profit.

1 Like

Investment income is any time the DAO realises a capital gain I.e. there is a sale of an non-STG asset from protocol owned liquidity for another token for a profit.

in the case that the token that is received is in a USD-based token (like USDC), then there would not be a sale required, but it should still be seen as investment income. you agree, correct?

1 Like

The way I see it is there’s currently/will be 3 revenue streams for the protocol moving forward.

  1. Fees generated from the protocols core business products aka Stargate V2 and bridging fees

  2. Yield generated via the treasury. This comes in the form of the USDC.e/HONEY on Berachain

  3. Incentives received from chain teams for Stargate to deploy a pool or Hydra.

I presume Exahash is mainly referring to point 2 here?

1 Like

In this case will fees generated from STG/USDC positions be returned to the DAO or would those fees also go to stakers?

1 Like

In Berachains case where its unique, the yield in BGT cannot be returned to stakers given that they come in the form of a soulbound NFT and the DAO aims to delegate and play an active role in Berachains governance. The rewards received from the Berachain bribes to the delegated BGT however, can be considered as investment income.

2 Likes

Are there any final comments or edits required by the community or Stargate team before publishing a final version for final review?

Final version of the proposal to be posted on Snapshot for voting on or after Monday, 21 April 0000 UTC. As this proposal is material and shortly after the Easter period, it will be proposed for 7 days (rather than 3 days) to give sufficient time for consideration and voting.

Balanced earnings distribution: Increasing Value Accrual for STG Stakers

Issue Statement

With the rollout of Stargate v2, the AIPM and Hydra’s demonstration of superior capital efficiency, the need to aggressively accumulate Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) at current levels has diminished. The Stargate DAO proposes adjusting the distribution of protocol earnings, increasing the share allocated to veSTG stakeholders to 50% of total earnings while retaining an equal 50% as POL.

The existing Vote-Escrowed Stargate Token (veSTG) mechanism cannot be upgraded. By increasing the distribution of protocol earnings, we aim to incentivize token holders to stake STG and participate in ecosystem governance. This shift aligns incentives with a dual mandate: fostering the protocol’s long-term growth while delivering reasonable returns to Stargate DAO stakeholders.

Allocating 50% of transfer fees and investment income to veSTG holders enhances the value proposition of the STG token for all holders. Simultaneously, retaining 50% as POL ensures sustainable operations and supports the Stargate Foundation, which relies on treasury STG sales to fund ongoing activities.

Proposed Solution

The updated fee structure for Stargate is as follows:

  • veSTG Holders: 50% of the previous calendar month’s transfer fees and investment income, distributed by the 10th of the current month.
  • POL: 50% of earnings retained as Protocol-Owned Liquidity.

Clause on Revenue Streams, Investment Returns, and Liquidation Process

All revenue streams, including realised returns from treasury investments, shall be accounted for transparently and distributed to STG stakers as outlined in this proposal.

For clarity, revenue for the StargateDAO is expected to derive from three primary streams:

  1. Core Business Fees: Revenue generated from the protocol fees.
  2. Treasury Yield: Returns generated from treasury investments.
  3. Chain Incentives: Incentives received from chain teams to deploy Stargate pools or Hydra.

This proposal encompasses all investments made on behalf of the StargateDAO, including those with unrealised returns.

For investments expected to yield returns in non-USDC assets (e.g., ETH or other tokens), a defined liquidation and distribution process shall apply. Upon realisation of returns, non-USDC assets must be converted to USDC before the 1st of each month and before calculation of distributable fees, unless otherwise approved by a governance vote (e.g. strategic investments). The converted USDC shall then be distributed to STG stakers in accordance with the monthly fee distribution. This process ensures returns are realised and distributed promptly, thereby safeguarding value accrual for STG stakers.

Measuring Success

In June 2022 (see “Value Accrual for STG Stakers”), the initial target was 15 million STG tokens staked, with an average lockup duration of 2 years. Following SIP#18 (Staking Reward Distribution Plan), the actual amount staked has doubled to 36 million STG. However, the average staking duration has fallen to approximately 300 days—well below the 2-year goal.

Despite achieving significant growth over the last three years, the STG token price has underperformed (after accounting for market conditions and sales of tokens from treasury used to fund Stargate operations).
Four primary factors explain this:

  1. Investor Expectations: Stakers require higher returns to compensate for long-term risks, including duration risk, smart contract vulnerabilities, opportunity costs, rising competition, and technological obsolescence.
  2. Farming Rewards: Liquidity providers to pools were until recently paid in STG placing a constant sell pressure on the token. Although incentives for liquidity providers have been turned off, STG is paid as incentives for other sources of liquidity such as Boyco pools.
  3. Governance Misalignment: Large STG holders, including team members with vested allocations, have been excluded from governance participation and from earning a staking yield.
  4. Margin Compression and Competition: not all competitors are acting in ways that are sustainable. Many are pushing models that are not financially viable, can’t scale or settle high value transactions economically.

This proposal addresses these issues by rebalancing incentives to better align stakeholder interests with the protocol’s financial performance. It aims to encourage staking STG to provide an attractive income stream as a reasonable market return for long-term investing in the Stargate ecosystem.

A separate proposal will follow, seeking DAO approval for employee staking and governance participation after the team allocation vesting period concluded in March 2025.

Execution, Timeline, and Costs

If approved, implementation will begin on June 1, 2025, with the first distribution under the new 50/50 structure occurring on July 10, 2025, reflecting June’s earnings. Financial accounting and implementation costs will be covered by the approved budget for the Stargate Foundation.

Summary

Market signals indicate a need to evolve the utility and functionality of the STG token. This proposal balances earnings distribution to encourage staking and reinforces long-term commitment to the protocol. While POL growth remains important, the interests of veSTG stakeholders are equally critical to Stargate’s financial success. By aligning these priorities, the DAO can strengthen the ecosystem and enhance value accrual for all.

2 Likes

What is the monthly revenue from the activities in question? What type of distributions can veSTG holders expect at current staking rates?