This seems like a well-thought-out proposal and looks like a step in the right direction. My theory is that bridges in themselves are almost no revenue-making machines, as the competitive landscape has evolved and a bridge having an independent token does more harm than good. For a bridge to be a well oiled machinery it should be supported and funded by a bigger entity that can be a cross-chain message protocol or a Layer-1 which wants to bring better liquidity and users to their ecosystem.
With the dissolution of STG token – I beleive the team would be able to lock-in and focus on what really matters. Managing two tokens is a pain and causes more distractions than necessarry.
I fully support the proposal and I beleive the STG holders will capture more upside in ZRO than they could potentially capture in STG because of the infirmness of the bridge as a business model.